Oral health and caries risk profile assessment using the the Cariogram in thalassemia patients with or without splenectomy: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Splenectomy is performed in ß-thalassemia cases due to the destruction of red blood cells (RBCs), and the consequent splenomegaly. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to compare oral health and the caries risk between ß-thalassemia patients with or without splenectomy, using the Cariogram. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional study carried out in both the Maternity and Children Hospital and the King Fahad Hospital, Al-Madinah al-Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia, interviews, salivary sampling and oral clinical examinations were performed on 60 children and adolescents with ß-thalassemia major (mean age: 13 ±3 years; 65% with splenectomy). The Cariogram program was used to calculate the caries risk. The main outcome measures were the number of decayed, missing due to caries, and filled teeth (DMFT), plaque and gingival indices, and the caries risk. RESULTS: Of individuals with and without splenectomy, tooth brushing was reported in 49% and 57%, respectively (p > 0.05). Individuals with splenectomy had lower plaque and gingival bleeding scores (p ≤ 0.05). Salivary secretion was identical in both groups. Caries experience and the caries risk were higher in individuals without splenectomy (p > 0.05 and p ≤ 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Within the study limitations, children and adolescents with ß-thalassemia had high plaque and gingival bleeding scores, as well as caries experience and caries risk. Those with splenectomy demonstrated lower figures than those without. Individuals with ß-thalassemia, particularly those with splenectomy, need to be educated about the oral side effects of the disease and its treatment.

Practicing Dentists' Self-Efficacy and Associated Factors in Managing the Treatment of Adults with Mental and Physical Disabilities: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Background: Provision of oral healthcare to adults with mental and physical disabilities (AMPD) remains a challenging area across various healthcare systems. The present study aimed to assess self-reported efficacy and investigate factors associated with self-efficacy in the management of AMPD among practicing dentists in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A pilot-tested, self-administered questionnaire was distributed to a convenience sample of 1000 dentists. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed on the collected responses. Results: Among the respondents (54%), 43% were males. Only 14% described their self-efficacy in managing AMPD as "High". Multivariable regression analyses revealed significant associations between "High" self-efficacy and male gender (Odd ratio (OR) = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.16-4.89), experience practicing dentistry for 11 years or more (OR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.04-4.47), specialization in pediatric dentistry (OR = 3.98, 95% CI = 1.31-12.07), previous experience in managing AMPD (OR = 4.23, 95% CI = 1.59-11.22), and awareness of regulations for managing AMPD (OR = 2.62, 95% CI = 1.42-4.38). The interaction of gender x age was significantly associated (p = 0.028) with "High" self-efficacy. Gender-stratified analyses revealed a significant association between age and "High" self-efficacy among male dentists only. Conclusions: The findings of the present study highlight that a large percentage of dentists reported "Low/Moderate" self-efficacy in managing AMPD, particularly among female dentists. However, further studies are required to verify the factors associated with self-efficacy in the present study, and to identify other factors that may influence self-efficacy in managing AMPD.